Our resident film connoisseur, Joe, would like to weigh in from time to time on the state of modern cinema. His thoughts on some recent ventures in the celluloid marketplace:
Eagle Eye: Infuriating, pretentious, contrived, shallow, preposterous, unoriginal salamander manure. Your critic spent the majority of this film pondering the substances the creators were under the influence of during it's making. Shia LaBoeuf gives a performance so stilted, it makes Keanu Reeves look like a versatile, well-rounded, master thespian. The sheer banality of the plot incites a veritable cornucopia of vitriol in the mind of this lowly interpreter. A mindless slug would be unimpressed with this slapdash assemblage of half-assed, pea-brained, bamboozling garbage.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
You're words seem so woebeggoten. While i did find it dreadful, it had a good beginning. So much potential, i was certain it was going to be a good movie, and I wanted to get my money back. In fact, I had already seen the movie. It's called I-Robot. Overall though, the plot line was simple, I guessed the entire ending about halfway through, and I have a witness for that. And what was up with the action scenes? I don't think you know what I'm talking about because there weren't any. A failure in the end. Such a sad thing to waste 24 dollars since it was an I-MAX.
I'm flabbergasted by my own words. I don't wish to repeat, so i'll be curt. The plotline sucked, and has been done before. the screenplay was very good, but lacked action. I would give this movie a D-.
Post a Comment